The IPCC are confident this has no effect on climate change.
Objective science cannot be limited by an agenda. If it is then it is neither scientific nor objective. Each working group’s Assessment Reports are solely focused upon AGW. If the objective is to understand the process of climate change, this makes no sense whatsoever.
There is a wealth of evidence that the Earth’s climate is an extremely complex system which is determined by innumerable factors. Making predictions based upon a predetermined assumption of ‘cause’ is ridiculous. Something which the IPCC admit.
For example, recent research by a team led by Professor of Mathematics Valentina Zharkova (PhD in Astrophysics) was able to accurately predict solar cycles and demonstrate the potential impact of an approaching Grand Solar Minimum on climate. However, because the IPCC consider AGW to be the only possible cause of climate change, they have nothing at all to say about the impact of the Sun on the Earth’s climate. Which renders their opinion on climate utterly meaningless.
Claims that the IPCC represent the world’s leading experts on climate change are risible. All they represent are the world’s leading proponents of anthropogenic global warming. An unproven hypothesis which doesn’t stand up to any scrutiny.
Greta has no doubt been alarmed by the world’s media who, after being issued with the IPCC’s various ‘Summary For Policy Makers,’ unhesitatingly report the IPCC’s catastrophic predictions. They then leap upon any ‘science’ they can find which supports the summary. Usually with farcical results.
For example a recent study published in the prestigious journal Nature, by researchers from Princeton University, claimed alarming ocean warming, further heating the climate and causing sea level rises. This was widely reported as further evidence of the impending doomsday. I’m sure Greta was scared witless.
However, unlike the MSM, who’s ‘science correspondents’ never seem to check anything related to climate alarmism, when interested scientist Nic Lewis decided to actually review the Princeton paper he discovered they had got the basic mathematics wrong. The average temperature rise appeared to be less than previous increases, not more. Suggesting a reduction of the energy uptake in the system. While MSM outlets prominently splashed the dire prophecies everywhere, the few who bothered to issue retractions relegated them to the obscurity of the minor pages. Thereby ensuring Greta, and thousands of other schoolchildren, remained both misinformed and fearful.
If the process of arriving at the various assessment reports, and the alarmism which follows, lacks scientific credibility, the Summary For Policy Makers (SPM) is completely devoid of any basis in science. It is decided by a committee of politicians called a ‘plenary panel.’ Supposedly based upon evidence, which is itself irrationally constrained, the political representatives of the world’s governments decide on the wording of the report.
In other words, the IPCC is a political lobby group designed to promote one concept, AGW, to the exclusion of all others. An approach which is the antithesis of the scientific method.
Greta, and the hundreds of thousands of protesting children inspired by her PR team, had absolutely no idea at all that they were marching to promote an economic agenda, designed by multinational corporations. This agenda is based upon spurious scientific evidence, is advocated by compliant political puppets and aims to increase taxation and consolidate control of resources.
Very far indeed from ‘saving the planet.’
Who Funded the Child Protest and Why?
Greenpeace is the richest environmentalist lobby group in the world. Among its major donors are the Tides Foundation. Established in 1976 by Drummond Pike, the son of a wealthy Investment Banker, who could therefore afford to invest his life in activism, the Tides Foundation and Pike have somewhat murky backgrounds. In 2008 it was revealed that Pike paid back nearly $1m that fellow Tides Foundation board member Dale Rathke had allegedly embezzled from the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN.) Why he did this remains unknown.
Due to their tax exemptions, the Tides Foundation can withhold information about where their donor’s money is directed but, given that Greenpeace list them as a major contributor, the evidence suggests that a number of those doners contribute to Greenpeace and, subsequently, Fridays for Future and Strike4Climate. Follow the money and we find out who was behind the child protest.
The Open Society Foundation (OSF) is the tax haven slush fund off the billionaire globalist, venture capitalist George Soros. It is a major Tides donor. The bulk of Greenpeace funding comes from unnamed, private donors. However, Greenpeace were instrumental in coordinating the 2017 ‘Peoples Climate March,’ to which Soros was a major contributor. Soros is a significant ‘individual donor’ to a variety of environmentalist causes. He is also invests heavily in the fossil fuel industry, is a convicted fraudster and a leading member of the eugenicist ‘think tank’ the Club of Rome.
Another Tides contributor is the Ford Foundation. It was established as a tax write off by well-known fascist sympathiser and eugenicist Henry Ford in 1936. It has collaborated extensively in population control initiatives with the Rockefeller Foundation. They began their involvement in the Environmentalist Movement in the 1960’s.
Similarly the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) contribute to the Tides Foundation. RF invests heavily in ‘renewable energy’ and ‘education’ and is one of the tax avoidance vehicles used by the globalist bankers, the Rockefeller family. It was the Rockefellers who formed the Club of Rome and have long argued for ‘population control.’
In fact, rather like the AGW hypothesis today, eugenics (racial supremacy) and population control (which means depopulation) were widely accepted as ‘settled science’ for much of the 19th and 20th century. The link between the eugenicists and the environmental lobby was firmly established by Maurice Strong in his opening speech at the 1992 Rio Earth summit. Speaking about global population growth he said:
“Central to the issues we are going to have to deal with are: ……..the explosive increase in population, largely in the developing world.……this growth cannot continue. Population must be stabilized……. “
Strong was clearly indicating his belief, shared by many of the billionaire philanthropists who fund climate change alarmism, that the world’s human population needs to be culled. However Strong’s ideas were formed earlier when he was also a leading member of the Rockefeller funded “Club of Rome” (CoR).
In 1972 the ‘world’s leading climate scientists’ were all warning the world about the coming Ice Age. However, Strong and his fellow CoR members, like Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, were already planning for global warming. In their report called ‘The World’s First Revolution,’ the CoR wrote:
“In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”
Essentially the globalists like Strong, David Rockefeller and latterly George Soros, are seeking to establish the New World Order. Something they have spoken about at length in numerous interviews. For them, the NWO is single, global system of financial control which manages all of the Earths resources under their unelected leadership. They have long used the unsubstantiated hypothesis of AGW to advance their globalist, eugenic agenda. This is why they created the UNEP, UNFCCC and the IPCC.
The Paris Agreement set up the NDC’s are to be implemented at the local level through Agenda 2030, using the U.N’s Sustainable Development Goals(SDG’s.) These aim to place control of food, water, air, land, sea, energy, government, economy, gender and health in the hands of the international banking cartel. Wherever you live on Earth simply Google (or better, Startpage) “Your Home Town” + “sustainability” and you will quickly find the impact of Agenda 2030 on your local community.
Co-opting children to advance your totalitarian political agenda is nothing new. Hitler, another eugenicist, had his Hitlerjugend and Stalin his Komsomol. The objective is always the same. To brainwash the youth with your ideology in order to eliminate all dissent against your absolute rule within a generation. The methods never change either. Provide the children only with the carefully selected information that supports your agenda and tell them that anyone who opposes your self serving world view is either dangerous, stupid or both. As the children mature their radicalisation can then be employed to enforce your policy agenda. By force if necessary. By the time they become adults, through strict control of education and the media, most will have no idea that other opinions, or counter evidence, ever existed.
Sadly, while Greta and her global army of child protestors, have acted from nothing but the very best of intentions, they have been ruthlessly exploited to advance the globalist ambitions of multinational corporations. It isn’t their fault.
The same cannot be said for the adults who blindly accept everything they are told, without any critical thought. Propelling the children, and the rest of us, into a dystopian control grid.