JULIAN ASSANGE, MK-ULTRA AND THE ROTHSCHILD CONNECTION WIKILEAKS USED BY THE ILLUMINATI? Reblogged from source @ https://pijamasurf.com/2010/12/julian-assange-mk-ultra-y-la-conexion-rothschild-¿wikileaks-usado-por-los-iluminati

JULIAN ASSANGE, MK-ULTRA AND THE ROTHSCHILD CONNECTION WIKILEAKS USED BY THE ILLUMINATI?

BY: ALEISTER CROMBY AND WITCH – 12/24/201

WIKILEAKS COULD BE THE 9-11 OF THE INTERNET AND JULIAN ASSANGE A NEW BIN LADEN USED BY THE ELITE THAT CONTROLS THE MEDIA AND THE BANKS OF OUR PLANET TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE

Julian Assange, the product of the year. Assange assaulting the world by “surprise”, like a lone ranger of transparency (at least the face of transparency). The leader of WikiLeaks, there is no doubt, is the closest media, counterculturally, to Che Guevara, that icon iterated and used to sell an ideal precisely by those that the “ideal” originally fought. Che Guevara is a post-mortem capitalist. Assange, involuntarily or voluntarily, seems that he will meet the same fate and will collaborate to ensure that freedom of information is guarded ( promoting new laws to control cyber networks), a trap precisely, a freedom trap … will help the same system whose injustices and human violations it denounced in Afghanistan, in Iraq and within the embassies, to advance in its totalitarian plan. Perhaps Julian Assange, in addition, is the new Osama bin Laden, the former CIA agent, trained in Pakistan, later turned public enemy 1 of the world, and whose terrorist organization provoked laws such as the Patriot Act, which allows spying on the citizens and increased security at airports to the limit of the perverse.

WikiLeaks may be what it claims to be, the Wikipedia of secret information, a collective, non-profit effort whose interest is to contribute to information freedom. Formed by hackers, whose mantra was always “information wants to be free” and in the specific case, as suggested by the internal WikiLeaks emails published on the Cryptome site of the defector, John Young, with the intention of fucking everyone: “fuck them all “. Apparently a sincere attempt to expose the political sewer that corrodes the veins of the planet.

It is possible that it is only the disbelief of the conspiracy media, which in paranoia and resentment, do not consent to anything that does not confirm their most radical theories: that there is a single and all-encompassing conspiracy that controls the planet. And that anything that comes from the media that, apparently, would be supporting this monolithic conspiracy, has to be a trick with a hidden agenda. How to think that Grupo Prisa, or the New York Times, seriously attack the system and the status quo that feeds them, that in a way they attack themselves? Why in the case of climategate, some media objected that they could not publish hacked information, but in the case of WikiLeaks there are no such ethics? What is it not true that Assange himself has accepted that the cables are reviewed and edited by the media to which they were entrusted ? The same Assange who has said that people who ask him about the 9-11 attacks only distract from real conspiracies. Why are there no cables from this conspiracy or from aliens or from Israel? Must there be in order for the WikiLeaks cables to be a real effort against the political mainstream?

This is what some conspiratorial bloggers reason, for whom what WikiLeaks reveals does not fit into their narrative of what the hidden truth must be. The truth is that Assange is the center of the projection of fantasies and fears, both of the conspirators, and of millions of people with a slight tendency to the left, who are looking for a new hero, a stroke of freedom. And the media, ready, with Assange, give it to them. The truth is that beyond a level of sociological and psychological interpretation, we cannot access the truth, without a doubt, that we would all like to discover, according to our vision of the world: we cannot say that Julian Assange is an agent of the CIA or that it works for the Mossad or that it is being used by the Illuminati, but to say otherwise, that Assange is a sincere modern hero who fights against the oppressive system, would also be naive. In that muddy terrain in which information currently moves, always between overinformation and misinformation, between hidden agendas and paranoia, we will try to present what is a reason to suspect the authenticity of WikiLeaks or that this organization is being manipulated.

LSD, MK-Ultra and WikiLeaks programming

In Assange’s Wikipedia entry we read that his mother, Christine, married in 1979 (Julian was born in 71) to a member of the Australian New Age cult Sanitniketan Park Association (also called The Great White Brotherhood), which was led by yoga teacher Anne Hamilton Byrne. This group was characterized by recruiting mental patients, doctors and nurses to its ranks and having its headquarters at Kew Hospital, where LSD and electroshock therapy were administered to patients.

Ann Hamilton Byrne, “acquired fourteen children between the years 1968 and 1975”, some of whom were natural children of members of the group, others were adopted through obscure legal procedures, something that was later proven. According to Wikipedia, children were dosed with drugs such as Anatensol, Diazepam, Haloperidol, Serepax, Tegretol, and more. When they reached adolescence they were dosed with LSD.

There is no reliable information on whether Assange lived in this environment with his mother’s husband from 1979 to 1982 or simply his mother’s husband, a musician, held these beliefs. Assange had grown up on Magnetic Island and his parents were part of a traveling theater company; his life would be from the beginning that of a modern nomad.

On the other hand, the journalist Webester Tarpley, interviewed by Alex Jones, points out that Assange perfectly fits the profile of a “MK-Ultra child”, that is, of the CIA mind control program that used LSD. Webster Tarpley’s inference is based solely on his perception of what these MK-Ultra children are and on the fact, he tells Alex Jones, that he sees a CIA-style agenda on WikiLeaks. Tarpley says that the WikiLeaks documents did not actually attack anyone other than a CIA agent or only targeted people like Putin and Berlusconi, who are beyond the control of the elite. Tarpley adds that the disclosed information could easily have been known to anyone who paid attention to the local media. In this sense, WikiLeaks would consist of a typical strategy of intelligence agencies, which in this case would work by combating the leakage of secret information with leakage of information that suffocates the rest and with greater legitimacy, which suggests that WikiLeaks filters it is it is the top of what is hidden. A strategy reminiscent of the Rockefeller family adviser, Ivy Lee, who in a media crisis almost 100 years ago leaked internal family documents to skew public opinion.

Tarpley and Jones believe that Assange may not even know that he is working for the elite agenda; Only the appropriate information would be filtered out to him and his behavior would be predicted through his psychological profile disrupted by CIA programs. On the other hand, Tarpley points out that Assange’s hacker name is “Mendax”, which basically means “the liar.”

Both John Young, the founder of the Cryptome site, and Daniel Domscheit-Berg (aka Schmidt) founder of OpenLeaks, both former WikiLeaks, have left the organization due to differences with Assange, arguing that Assange lost the floor and is extremely egocentric (the ego of Assange what time he receives the catering from the medium could be just the way to manipulate the WikiLeaks project). Berg, in addition, who will handle WikiLeaks’ finances, according to these documents , shows his concern about secret funds. “I assumed Danie Schmidt smelled a rat, or a failed payment, and confronted Assange. Which led to the breakup,” Young writes. Young must have suspected something was wrong because he made an official request to George Soros’s Open Society Institute to be informed under the Freedom of Information Act if this institute had funded WikiLeaks. The Open Society Institute only responded to him in receipt but did not answer his questions. Assange has denied that he has a relationship with speculator Soros .

John Young, publishes on his Cryptome site (which some call an unedited WikiLeaks) the following link to an article that theorizes that WikiLeaks is a CIA operation (the CIA has formed a special group to deal with WikiLeaks, under the acronym WTF, also an acronym for What the Fuck !, what some call an inside joke about the possibility that they themselves operate part of WikiLeaks).

According to the Syria Truth site, Daniel Domscheit-Berg told his correspondent in Berlin that Assange received money from Mossad to protect Israel from the leaked cables.

The Rothschild connection and WikiLeaks’ relationship with the mainsteam media

Among the suspicions of the WikiLeaks affair, there is the love relationship with the mainstream media, for example the New York Times (or its magazine the New Yorker) has interviewed Assange a couple of times, including an interview conducted by Raffi Khatchadurian, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a powerful political organization led by David Rockefeller. Assange was also interviewed by Richard Stengel of Times magazine, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. New York Times company director Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and his family has been a member of the Rockefeller Foundation.

A good question would be why do journalists belong to political organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and attend meetings like the Bilderberg Group? Which reveals the close relationship between the political and financial elite and journalism. The CIA’s Operation Mocking Bird was formed in the 1950s to influence foreign and domestic media. As with these types of groups, it is accepted that it existed but is said to have ceased to exist, which is highly unlikely considering the way the CIA operates and the importance of the media and the easy access they have to them through large corporations almost monolithic.

Assange himself has accepted that the media to which he delivers the cables edit and write the information .

On the other side of New York, in London, the equivalent of the Rockefellers, are the Rothschilds, a family that to some extent invented the modern banking system. It is perhaps no accident that The Economist awarded Assange the New Media award in 2008. The Economist magazine is owned by The Ecnomist Group, half of which is owned by the Financial Times, a subsidiary of Pearson PLC. An international group of shareholders, including The Rothschild Banking family of England owns the rest. Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was editor of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. Was it any coincidence that the Rothschild family, whose patriarch Mayer Amsel said in 1790 “let me control and print a nation’s money and I don’t care who makes the laws” , control the two most influential print financial publications?

The connection to the Rothschild family extends to Julian Assange’s attorney, Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, who is also the legal counsel for the Rothschilds’ Waddesdon Trust. Is it a coincidence that Assange spent the months prior to the leak of the embassy cables, which had already been announced, in London, under the Rothschilds?

The Rothschild family, although now part of the British nobility, has a clear Jewish origin (as did the Rockefellers), and was instrumental in the formation of the state of Israel. The Rothschilds recently built the Supreme Court of Isarel, a building of evident Masonic architecture, which even has a pyramid with one eye.

When speaking of the Illuminati, the Rothschilds are generally mentioned as one of the bloodlines that holds power. It is possible that the Illuminati, as such, did not really exist, or only existed in the late 18th century, founded by Adam Weishaupt, that they are just the front to distract the conspiracyists. But it is difficult to deny that the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, eminently banking and oil families, do not exercise a power greater than that of the politicians in turn. His influence is not limited to an election, it spans decades asserting his shadow empire. In this sense, it is difficult to think that they have no hand in the WikiLeaks affair, but what is their agenda?

In 2008 Stanford professor Larry Lessig said that “There is going to be an i-9/11 event” that will serve as a catalyst for a radical restructuring of Internet-related laws (an electronic Patriot Act). It is curious that in 2000, the Project for a New American Century, a think tank, in which Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz participated, wrote in a report that a new Pearl Harbor-type event was necessary. A year later the event of the twin towers occurred (which Assange does not consider a conspiracy)

Are we seeing a paradoxical staging where the hero of the internet, voluntarily or involuntarily, ends the freedom of the internet that motivates his crusade? Perhaps it is no coincidence that the Federal Communications Commission of the United States this week approved a law that would end the neutrality of the net when it comes to wireless access. Or that the UN has started talks to form a global Internet government . WikiLeaks, the 9-11 of the Internet?

BY: ALEISTER CROMBY AND WITCH – 12/24/2010WIKILEAKS COULD BE THE 9-11 OF THE INTERNET AND JULIAN ASSANGE A NEW BIN LADEN USED BY THE ELITE THAT CONTROLS THE MEDIA AND THE BANKS OF OUR PLANET TO TAKE CONTROL OF THE NETWORK

Julian Assange, the product of the year. Assange assaulting the world by “surprise”, like a lone ranger of transparency (at least the face of transparency).

The leader of WikiLeaks, there is no doubt, is the closest media, counterculturally, to Che Guevara, that icon iterated and used to sell an ideal precisely by those that the “ideal” originally fought.

Che Guevara is a post-mortem capitalist. Assange, involuntarily or voluntarily, seems that he will meet the same fate and will collaborate to ensure that freedom of information is guarded ( promoting new laws to control cyber networks), a trap precisely, a freedom trap … will help the same system whose injustices and human violations it denounced in Afghanistan, in Iraq and within the embassies, to advance in its totalitarian plan.

Perhaps Julian Assange, in addition, is the new Osama bin Laden, the former CIA agent, trained in Pakistan, later turned public enemy 1 of the world, and whose terrorist organization provoked laws such as the Patriot Act, which allows spying on the citizens and increased security at airports to the limit of the perverse.

WikiLeaks may be what it claims to be, the Wikipedia of secret information, a collective, non-profit effort whose interest is to contribute to information freedom.

Formed by hackers, whose mantra was always “information wants to be free” and in the specific case, as suggested by the internal WikiLeaks emails published on the Cryptome site of the defector, John Young, with the intention of fucking everyone: “fuck them all “.

Apparently a sincere attempt to expose the political sewer that corrodes the veins of the planet.

It is possible that it is only the disbelief of the conspiracy media, which in paranoia and resentment, do not consent to anything that does not confirm their most radical theories: that there is a single and all-encompassing conspiracy that controls the planet.

And that anything that comes from the media that, apparently, would be supporting this monolithic conspiracy, has to be a trick with a hidden agenda.

How to think that Grupo Prisa, or the New York Times, seriously attack the system and the status quo that feeds them, that in a way they attack themselves?

Why in the case of climategate, some media objected that they could not publish hacked information, but in the case of WikiLeaks there are no such ethics?

What is it not true that Assange himself has accepted that the cables are reviewed and edited by the media to which they were entrusted ?

The same Assange who has said that people who ask him about the 9-11 attacks only distract from real conspiracies.

Why are there no cables from this conspiracy or from aliens or from Israel?

Must there be in order for the WikiLeaks cables to be a real effort against the political mainstream?

This is what some conspiratorial bloggers reason, for whom what WikiLeaks reveals does not fit into their narrative of what the hidden truth must be.

The truth is that Assange is the center of the projection of fantasies and fears, both of the conspirators, and of millions of people with a slight tendency to the left, who are looking for a new hero, a stroke of freedom.

And the media, ready, with Assange, give it to them. The truth is that beyond a level of sociological and psychological interpretation, we cannot access the truth, without a doubt, that we would all like to discover, according to our vision of the world: we cannot say that Julian Assange is an agent of the CIA or that it works for the Mossad or that it is being used by the Illuminati, but to say otherwise, that Assange is a sincere modern hero who fights against the oppressive system, would also be naive.

In that muddy terrain in which information currently moves, always between overinformation and misinformation, between hidden agendas and paranoia, we will try to present what is a reason to suspect the authenticity of WikiLeaks or that this organization is being manipulated.

LSD, MK-Ultra and WikiLeaks programming

In Assange’s Wikipedia entry we read that his mother, Christine, married in 1979 (Julian was born in 71) to a member of the Australian New Age cult Sanitniketan Park Association (also called The Great White Brotherhood), which was led by yoga teacher Anne Hamilton Byrne.

This group was characterized by recruiting mental patients, doctors and nurses to its ranks and having its headquarters at Kew Hospital, where LSD and electroshock therapy were administered to patients.

Ann Hamilton Byrne, “acquired fourteen children between the years 1968 and 1975”, some of whom were natural children of members of the group, others were adopted through obscure legal procedures, something that was later proven.

According to Wikipedia, children were dosed with drugs such as Anatensol, Diazepam, Haloperidol, Serepax, Tegretol, and more. When they reached adolescence they were dosed with LSD.

There is no reliable information on whether Assange lived in this environment with his mother’s husband from 1979 to 1982 or simply his mother’s husband, a musician, held these beliefs.

Assange had grown up on Magnetic Island and his parents were part of a traveling theater company; his life would be from the beginning that of a modern nomad.

On the other hand, the journalist Webester Tarpley, interviewed by Alex Jones, points out that Assange perfectly fits the profile of a “MK-Ultra child”, that is, of the CIA mind control program that used LSD.

Webster Tarpley’s inference is based solely on his perception of what these MK-Ultra children are and on the fact, he tells Alex Jones, that he sees a CIA-style agenda on WikiLeaks.

Tarpley says that the WikiLeaks documents did not actually attack anyone other than a CIA agent or only targeted people like Putin and Berlusconi, who are beyond the control of the elite.

Tarpley adds that the disclosed information could easily have been known to anyone who paid attention to the local media.

In this sense, WikiLeaks would consist of a typical strategy of intelligence agencies, which in this case would work by combating the leakage of secret information with leakage of information that suffocates the rest and with greater legitimacy, which suggests that WikiLeaks filters it is it is the top of what is hidden.

A strategy reminiscent of the Rockefeller family adviser, Ivy Lee, who in a media crisis almost 100 years ago leaked internal family documents to skew public opinion.

Tarpley and Jones believe that Assange may not even know that he is working for the elite agenda; Only the appropriate information would be filtered out to him and his behavior would be predicted through his psychological profile disrupted by CIA programs.

On the other hand, Tarpley points out that Assange’s hacker name is “Mendax”, which basically means “the liar.”

Both John Young, the founder of the Cryptome site, and Daniel Domscheit-Berg (aka Schmidt) founder of OpenLeaks, both former WikiLeaks, have left the organization due to differences with Assange, arguing that Assange lost the floor and is extremely egocentric (the ego of Assange what time he receives the catering from the medium could be just the way to manipulate the WikiLeaks project).

Berg, in addition, who will handle WikiLeaks’ finances, according to these documents , shows his concern about secret funds. “I assumed Danie Schmidt smelled a rat, or a failed payment, and confronted Assange. Which led to the breakup,” Young writes.

Young must have suspected something was wrong because he made an official request to George Soros’s Open Society Institute to be informed under the Freedom of Information Act if this institute had funded WikiLeaks.

The Open Society Institute only responded to him in receipt but did not answer his questions. Assange has denied that he has a relationship with speculator Soros .

John Young, publishes on his Cryptome site (which some call an unedited WikiLeaks) the following link to an article that theorizes that WikiLeaks is a CIA operation (the CIA has formed a special group to deal with WikiLeaks, under the acronym WTF, also an acronym for What the Fuck !, what some call an inside joke about the possibility that they themselves operate part of WikiLeaks).

According to the Syria Truth site, Daniel Domscheit-Berg told his correspondent in Berlin that Assange received money from Mossad to protect Israel from the leaked cables.

The Rothschild connection and WikiLeaks’ relationship with the mainsteam media

Among the suspicions of the WikiLeaks affair, there is the love relationship with the mainstream media, for example the New York Times (or its magazine the New Yorker) has interviewed Assange a couple of times, including an interview conducted by Raffi Khatchadurian, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, a powerful political organization led by David Rockefeller.

Assange was also interviewed by Richard Stengel of Times magazine, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

New York Times company director Arthur Sulzberger Jr. is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and his family has been a member of the Rockefeller Foundation.

A good question would be why do journalists belong to political organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations and attend meetings like the Bilderberg Group? Which reveals the close relationship between the political and financial elite and journalism.

The CIA’s Operation Mocking Bird was formed in the 1950s to influence foreign and domestic media.

As with these types of groups, it is accepted that it existed but is said to have ceased to exist, which is highly unlikely considering the way the CIA operates and the importance of the media and the easy access they have to them through large corporations almost monolithic.

Assange himself has accepted that the media to which he delivers the cables edit and write the information .

On the other side of New York, in London, the equivalent of the Rockefellers, are the Rothschilds, a family that to some extent invented the modern banking system. It is perhaps no accident that The Economist awarded Assange the New Media award in 2008.

The Economist magazine is owned by The Ecnomist Group, half of which is owned by the Financial Times, a subsidiary of Pearson PLC. An international group of shareholders, including The Rothschild Banking family of England owns the rest.

Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild was editor of The Economist from 1972 to 1989.

Was it any coincidence that the Rothschild family, whose patriarch Mayer Amsel said in 1790 “let me control and print a nation’s money and I don’t care who makes the laws” , control the two most influential print financial publications?

The connection to the Rothschild family extends to Julian Assange’s attorney, Mark Stephens of Finers Stephens Innocent, who is also the legal counsel for the Rothschilds’ Waddesdon Trust.

Is it a coincidence that Assange spent the months prior to the leak of the embassy cables, which had already been announced, in London, under the Rothschilds?

The Rothschild family, although now part of the British nobility, has a clear Jewish origin (as did the Rockefellers), and was instrumental in the formation of the state of Israel.

The Rothschilds recently built the Supreme Court of Isarel, a building of evident Masonic architecture, which even has a pyramid with one eye.

When speaking of the Illuminati, the Rothschilds are generally mentioned as one of the bloodlines that holds power.

It is possible that the Illuminati, as such, did not really exist, or only existed in the late 18th century, founded by Adam Weishaupt, that they are just the front to distract the conspiracyists.

But it is difficult to deny that the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, eminently banking and oil families, do not exercise a power greater than that of the politicians in turn. His influence is not limited to an election, it spans decades asserting his shadow empire.

In this sense, it is difficult to think that they have no hand in the WikiLeaks affair, but what is their agenda?

In 2008 Stanford professor Larry Lessig said that “There is going to be an i-9/11 event” that will serve as a catalyst for a radical restructuring of Internet-related laws (an electronic Patriot Act).

It is curious that in 2000, the Project for a New American Century, a think tank, in which Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz participated, wrote in a report that a new Pearl Harbor-type event was necessary.

A year later the event of the twin towers occurred (which Assange does not consider a conspiracy)

Are we seeing a paradoxical staging where the hero of the internet, voluntarily or involuntarily, ends the freedom of the internet that motivates his crusade? Perhaps it is no coincidence that the Federal Communications Commission of the United States this week approved a law that would end the neutrality of the net when it comes to wireless access.

Or that the UN has started talks to form a global Internet government . WikiLeaks, the 9-11 of the Internet?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s